Automation index
How much of a Embryologist’s job can AI already do?
A time-lapse comes earlier. Picking the embryo without mixing the file do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Embryologist
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#587 / 743
View rankingEmbryologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Retrieval, oocytes and the culture.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
ICSI, the sperm and the one that will not fertilise.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Time-lapse, the grade and picking.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Transfer, the catheter and not losing the embryo.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The file, the double check and not mixing couples.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Pick it, and not mixing the file.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- oocytes
- ICSI
- embryo culture
- time-lapse
- transfer
- double check
- egg retrieval
- embryo grade
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2011.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#176 / 743
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141