Automation index
How much of a Emergency physician’s job can AI already do?
Triage and a protocol come earlier. Deciding in five minutes and telling the family do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Emergency physician
20%
AI can already do 20% of this job.
#465 / 643
View rankingEmergency physician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Read vitals, ECG and shock protocols.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Assess, stabilise and prioritise beds.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Procedures: line, suture, CPR.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Brief family and negotiate doubtful discharges.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Notes, consults and ward admissions.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Shift, team and not leaving anyone in the corridor.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 20% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- care for patients
- diagnose
- nursing care
- clinical notes
- Read vitals, ECG and shock protocols
- Assess, stabilise and prioritise beds
- Procedures: line, suture, CPR
- Notes, consults and ward admissions
- medico de urgencias
- urgentologo
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1214.00· ESCO/ISCO 2212
IS WORK OVER?
Research scientist
27%
#139 / 643
View rankingResearch scientist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Literature review, figures and drafts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 48% | +10.6 |
Analysis, code and experiment boards.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 42% | +7.6 |
Design the study and the controls.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Run the experiment or the fieldwork.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
Lead a group, theses and authorship fights.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 15% | +2.1 |
Win funding and answer reviewers.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 16% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Literature review, figures and drafts
- Analysis, code and experiment boards
- Design the study and the controls
- Run the experiment or the fieldwork
- Lead a group, theses and authorship fights
- Win funding and answer reviewers
- cientifico
- investigador
- research scientist
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1029.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131