Automation index
How much of a Employment lawyer’s job can AI already do?
A stock dismissal comes earlier. Standing it up at conciliation without selling an easy yes do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Employment lawyer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#129 / 733
View rankingEmployment lawyer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Letter, the file and the deadline.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Conciliation, the SMAC and not yielding extra.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Hearing, the witness and the one who does not show.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The agreement, the article and not making it up.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The client, the rush and not signing what cannot be.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Stand it up, and not selling an easy yes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dismissals
- SMAC
- labour conciliation
- employment hearings
- collective agreements
- disciplinary files
- dismissal letters
- labour deadlines
Sources for this job· O*NET 23-1011.00· ESCO/ISCO 2611
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#175 / 733
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141