Automation index
How much of a Energy engineer’s job can AI already do?
A load curve comes earlier. Cutting the bill without leaving the process in the dark do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Energy engineer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#164 / 673
View rankingEnergy engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Energy audit, curves and the saving potential.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Contracts, tariffs and the power market.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Plant, meters and what the meter misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Efficiency projects and the real payback.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The board, the CAPEX and the no to the project.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Save for real, and not selling green smoke.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- energy audit
- load curves
- power tariffs
- energy efficiency
- CAPEX payback
- plant metering
- power market
- real savings
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2199.00· ESCO/ISCO 2149
IS WORK OVER?
Spanish language teacher
22%
#391 / 673
View rankingSpanish language teacher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Reading, the commentary and the rubric.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Writing, the paragraph and the one who will not start.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Speaking, the fear and getting them to talk.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Spelling, the mark-up and not humiliating.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Plagiarism, the web and not looking away.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they write with sense, and not copying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- text commentary
- writing
- speaking
- spelling
- language rubrics
- plagiarism
- paragraphs
- reading
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2330