Automation index
How much of a Environmental health officer’s job can AI already do?
A report comes earlier. Shutting the kitchen that poisons people without looking away do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Environmental health officer
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#446 / 703
View rankingEnvironmental health officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Inspection, the report and the sample.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Kitchen, the cold and the one that never gets there.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Water, the analysis and the village.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Shut it, the mayor and not yielding.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The outbreak, the source and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Shut the kitchen, and not looking away.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- inspection reports
- food safety
- water samples
- shut kitchens
- temperatures
- food outbreaks
- mayors
- not yield
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-5011.00· ESCO/ISCO 2263
IS WORK OVER?
Curriculum designer
27%
#157 / 703
View rankingCurriculum designer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Sequence, criteria and the kit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Pilot classroom, the teacher and what will not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Rubric, the marker and not inflating.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Review, inspection and not dressing it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The publisher, the deadline and not swallowing a cut.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it can be taught, and not dying in the PDF.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- teaching sequences
- criteria
- rubrics
- pilot classrooms
- curriculum kit
- inspection
- publishers
- dead PDF
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-9031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2351