Automation index
How much of a Equality officer’s job can AI already do?
A stock equality plan comes earlier. Stopping what happens in the corridor do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Equality officer
29%
AI can already do 29% of this job.
#72 / 643
View rankingEquality officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Diagnosis, equality plan and the pay register.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Harassment protocols, training and clauses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The complaint, the committee and what nobody wants to hear.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Indicators, annual report and bargaining with the firm.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The agreement, tenders and social clauses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
That it is done, and not left as a PDF.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- equality plans
- pay gap register
- harassment protocols
- equality training
- gap diagnosis
- social clauses
- equality indicators
- bargain with the firm
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2422
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#336 / 643
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211