Automation index
How much of a Equality officer’s job can AI already do?
A stock equality plan comes earlier. Stopping what happens in the corridor do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Equality officer
29%
AI can already do 29% of this job.
#72 / 703
View rankingEquality officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Diagnosis, equality plan and the pay register.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Harassment protocols, training and clauses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The complaint, the committee and what nobody wants to hear.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Indicators, annual report and bargaining with the firm.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The agreement, tenders and social clauses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
That it is done, and not left as a PDF.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- equality plans
- pay gap register
- harassment protocols
- equality training
- gap diagnosis
- social clauses
- equality indicators
- bargain with the firm
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2422
IS WORK OVER?
Instructional designer
27%
#158 / 703
View rankingInstructional designer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Aim, the storyboard and the module.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Pilot, the learner and what is not understood.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Activity, the feedback and not putting a silly test.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
LMS, the figure and not inflating completion.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The client, the deadline and not cutting the practice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That they learn, and not leaving the empty video.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- course storyboard
- modules
- learner pilot
- activities
- LMS
- completion
- feedback
- not a silly test
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-9031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2351