Automation index
How much of a Executive chef’s job can AI already do?
A dish sheet and a supplier order move earlier. The pass, the brigade, and a house’s taste do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Executive chef
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#500 / 653
View rankingExecutive chef
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Menus, dish sheets and food cost.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 38% | +6.8 |
Orders, suppliers and waste.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Pass, plating and service pace.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 20% | 10% | +2 |
Lead the brigade, shifts and conflicts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
Cook on the line and correct doneness.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 15% | +2.4 |
Hygiene, audits and the house’s name.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- cook
- mise en place
- dishes
- bake
- Menus, dish sheets and food cost
- Orders, suppliers and waste
- Pass, plating and service pace
- Lead the brigade, shifts and conflicts
- Cook on the line and correct doneness
- Hygiene, audits and the house’s name
Sources for this job· O*NET 35-1011.00· ESCO/ISCO 3434
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131