Automation index
How much of a Executive housekeeper’s job can AI already do?
A roster and a checklist come earlier. A hundred rooms out on time does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Executive housekeeper
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#436 / 653
View rankingExecutive housekeeper
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Roster, checklists and linen logs.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 40% | +7.2 |
Rounds, standards and VIP rooms.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Room team, shifts and conflict.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Front desk, maintenance and complaints.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Inventory, minibar and lost-and-found.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 16% | +2.6 |
Not handing a dirty room to a guest.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Roster, checklists and linen logs
- Rounds, standards and VIP rooms
- Room team, shifts and conflict
- Front desk, maintenance and complaints
- Inventory, minibar and lost-and-found
- Not handing a dirty room to a guest
- gobernanta
- ama de llaves
- executive housekeeper
Sources for this job· O*NET 37-1011.00· ESCO/ISCO 5151
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131