Automation index
How much of a Family lawyer’s job can AI already do?
An agreement comes earlier. Being in the court corridor without using the child do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Family lawyer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#128 / 733
View rankingFamily lawyer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Claim, measures and the agreement.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Hearing, the child and not using them as a weapon.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Enforcement, the maintenance and the one who will not pay.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The court team and not dismissing the report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The client, the hate and not pouring fuel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Not using the child. Ever.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- settlement agreements
- interim measures
- maintenance
- court team
- family hearings
- enforcement
- not use the child
- custody
Sources for this job· O*NET 23-1011.00· ESCO/ISCO 2611
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#175 / 733
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141