Automation index
How much of a Family support worker’s job can AI already do?
A household card comes earlier. Going into the home so the family gets through the day do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Family support worker
20%
AI can already do 20% of this job.
#486 / 653
View rankingFamily support worker
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
The intervention plan and case coordination.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Home, hygiene, food and the child who misses school.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Teach routines without replacing the parent.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Reports, social services and the school.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The row in the living room and getting out whole.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The bond, and not making yourself indispensable.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 20% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- home intervention
- teach routines
- family hygiene
- reports to social services
- home support
- truant child
- intervention plan
- not replacing the family
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1093.00· ESCO/ISCO 2635
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131