Automation index
How much of a Family support worker’s job can AI already do?
A household card comes earlier. Going into the home so the family gets through the day do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Family support worker
20%
AI can already do 20% of this job.
#472 / 633
View rankingFamily support worker
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
The intervention plan and case coordination.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Home, hygiene, food and the child who misses school.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Teach routines without replacing the parent.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Reports, social services and the school.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The row in the living room and getting out whole.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The bond, and not making yourself indispensable.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 20% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- home intervention
- teach routines
- family hygiene
- reports to social services
- home support
- truant child
- intervention plan
- not replacing the family
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1093.00· ESCO/ISCO 2635
IS WORK OVER?
Copy editor
31%
#32 / 633
View rankingCopy editor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Spelling, agreement and consistency.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Style, repetition and sentence rhythm.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Queries to the author, grey areas and the house style.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Second proofs, PDF and last-minute typos.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 22% | +4 |
Deadlines with publisher, layout and translation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Judgement, not over-rewriting, and the typo that remains.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- copy-edit
- spelling and punctuation
- unify style
- catch typos
- house style
- second proofs
- author queries
- avoid over-editing
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-3041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2641