Automation index
How much of a Family therapist’s job can AI already do?
A genogram comes earlier. Sitting with everyone in the same room without them walking out do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Family therapist
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#411 / 653
View rankingFamily therapist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Genogram, the brief and the frame.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Session, the one who speaks for all and the one who stays quiet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Conflict, the boundary and not taking sides.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The child, the loyalty and not using them as messenger.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The referral, the risk and calling it in time.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they stay, and not taking sides.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- genogram
- family frame
- joint sessions
- loyalties
- not take sides
- child-risk
- refer
- boundaries
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1013.00· ESCO/ISCO 2635
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211