Automation index
How much of a Farrier’s job can AI already do?
A hoof card comes earlier. Shoeing the horse so it is not lame the next day do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Farrier
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#516 / 653
View rankingFarrier
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Hoof, balance and the animal’s card.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Trim, nail and the one that will not stand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Forge, the made shoe and the trim.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Lameness, the vet and not blaming the shoe.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The yard, the owner and the one who does not pay.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Not lame, and not over-nailing.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- shoe horses
- balance
- trim hooves
- made shoes
- lameness
- the forge
- yards
- nail
Sources for this job· O*NET 45-2021.00· ESCO/ISCO 6121
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211