Automation index
How much of a Façade technician’s job can AI already do?
A panel list comes earlier. Hanging the façade without letting water in do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Façade technician
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#506 / 743
View rankingFaçade technician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Set-out, anchors and the panel list.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Hang, adjust and the panel that will not close.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 12% | +2.2 |
Joints, water and the weathertightness test.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Scaffold, cradle and façade wind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The architect, the sample and the shade that misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
No water in, and not forcing the anchor.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- hang façades
- anchors
- panel lists
- weathertightness
- cradle
- façade joints
- colour samples
- anchor set-out
Sources for this job· O*NET 47-2081.00· ESCO/ISCO 7123
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#176 / 743
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141