Automation index
How much of a Financial controller’s job can AI already do?
A pack and a budget come earlier. Saying the margin is not that does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Financial controller
26%
AI can already do 26% of this job.
#201 / 643
View rankingFinancial controller
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Reporting, budgets and variances.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 20% | 48% | +9.6 |
Close, provision and check against the books.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Management, plants and P&L owners.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Systems, masters and data quality.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Audit, controls and documentation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 16% | +2.6 |
Not dressing an EBIT.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Reporting, budgets and variances
- Management, plants and P&L owners
- Systems, masters and data quality
- Audit, controls and documentation
- Not dressing an EBIT
- controller
- control de gestion
- financial controller
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-2011.00· ESCO/ISCO 2411
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131