Automation index
How much of a Fishmonger’s job can AI already do?
A market order comes earlier. Picking the fish so it smells of sea, not fridge, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Fishmonger
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#363 / 633
View rankingFishmonger
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Order, market and what arrives fresh.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Clean, portion and the cut the customer wants.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 12% | +2.2 |
Counter, advice and the one who cannot cook it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Cold, ice and the piece that turns.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Christmas, the order and not running out of hake.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Smell of sea, and not selling yesterday as today.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- clean fish
- portion
- the market
- fish counter
- ice
- Christmas orders
- cut hake
- pick the fish
Sources for this job· O*NET 51-3022.00· ESCO/ISCO 6221
IS WORK OVER?
Copy editor
31%
#32 / 633
View rankingCopy editor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Spelling, agreement and consistency.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Style, repetition and sentence rhythm.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Queries to the author, grey areas and the house style.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Second proofs, PDF and last-minute typos.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 22% | +4 |
Deadlines with publisher, layout and translation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Judgement, not over-rewriting, and the typo that remains.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- copy-edit
- spelling and punctuation
- unify style
- catch typos
- house style
- second proofs
- author queries
- avoid over-editing
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-3041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2641