Automation index
How much of a Fishmonger’s job can AI already do?
A market order comes earlier. Picking the fish so it smells of sea, not fridge, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Fishmonger
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#372 / 643
View rankingFishmonger
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Order, market and what arrives fresh.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Clean, portion and the cut the customer wants.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 12% | +2.2 |
Counter, advice and the one who cannot cook it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Cold, ice and the piece that turns.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Christmas, the order and not running out of hake.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Smell of sea, and not selling yesterday as today.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- clean fish
- portion
- the market
- fish counter
- ice
- Christmas orders
- cut hake
- pick the fish
Sources for this job· O*NET 51-3022.00· ESCO/ISCO 6221
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#336 / 643
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211