Automation index

How much of a Foley artist’s job can AI already do?

A footstep list comes earlier. Foot, cloth and the hit sounding true do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

22%

AI can already do 22% of this job.

#322 / 633

Foley artist

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
List, picture and the point. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Footstep, cloth and the hit. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Stage, mics and the one that eats the dialogue. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Mix, the editor and the one that misses. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
The director, the taste and not loading extra steps. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
That it sounds true, and not covering the voice. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

24%

#283 / 633

Radiation therapist

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Plan, IGRT and the day’s set-up. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Immobilise, tattoo and treat fraction by fraction. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	22%	12%	+2.6
Check images, shifts and call the physician. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Side effects, the patient who cries and the wait. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Machine QA and alarms. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	32%	+5.1
Today’s dose and not irradiating the wrong thing. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	14%	14%	+2
Total	100%		24%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low