Automation index
How much of a Foley artist’s job can AI already do?
A footstep list comes earlier. Foot, cloth and the hit sounding true do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Foley artist
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#359 / 743
View rankingFoley artist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
List, picture and the point.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Footstep, cloth and the hit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Stage, mics and the one that eats the dialogue.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Mix, the editor and the one that misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The director, the taste and not loading extra steps.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That it sounds true, and not covering the voice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- footsteps
- cloth
- hits
- foley stage
- picture
- mics
- the mix
- effects lists
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-4014.00· ESCO/ISCO 3521
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#176 / 743
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141