Automation index
How much of a Football coach’s job can AI already do?
A lineup and a clip come earlier. Going out to compete without breaking do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Football coach
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#375 / 743
View rankingFootball coach
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Lineup, plan and the opponent clip.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Train, the one who is late and the one who hides.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Match, the changes and the one who boils.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Dressing room, the ego and not losing the group.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The board, the parents and not picking the son under pressure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Compete, and not breaking.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- lineups
- opponent clip
- training
- changes
- dressing room
- parents
- pick the side
- match plan
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2022.00· ESCO/ISCO 3422
IS WORK OVER?
Acoustics engineer
27%
#170 / 743
View rankingAcoustics engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Reading, the map and the standard.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Works, the insulation and what was not put in.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Simulation, the model and not trusting it alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Report, the neighbour and not softening the dB.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The council, the licence and not dressing it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Bring it down for real, and not selling the miracle panel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- noise maps
- insulation
- dB
- acoustic simulations
- standards
- licences
- neighbours
- field readings
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2199.00· ESCO/ISCO 2149