Automation index
How much of a Football coach’s job can AI already do?
A lineup and a clip come earlier. Going out to compete without breaking do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Football coach
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#338 / 643
View rankingFootball coach
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Lineup, plan and the opponent clip.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Train, the one who is late and the one who hides.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Match, the changes and the one who boils.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Dressing room, the ego and not losing the group.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The board, the parents and not picking the son under pressure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Compete, and not breaking.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- lineups
- opponent clip
- training
- changes
- dressing room
- parents
- pick the side
- match plan
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2022.00· ESCO/ISCO 3422
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131