Automation index
How much of a Football coach’s job can AI already do?
A lineup and a clip come earlier. Going out to compete without breaking do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Football coach
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#332 / 633
View rankingFootball coach
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Lineup, plan and the opponent clip.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Train, the one who is late and the one who hides.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Match, the changes and the one who boils.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Dressing room, the ego and not losing the group.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The board, the parents and not picking the son under pressure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Compete, and not breaking.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- lineups
- opponent clip
- training
- changes
- dressing room
- parents
- pick the side
- match plan
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2022.00· ESCO/ISCO 3422
IS WORK OVER?
Copy editor
31%
#32 / 633
View rankingCopy editor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Spelling, agreement and consistency.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Style, repetition and sentence rhythm.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Queries to the author, grey areas and the house style.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Second proofs, PDF and last-minute typos.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 22% | +4 |
Deadlines with publisher, layout and translation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Judgement, not over-rewriting, and the typo that remains.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- copy-edit
- spelling and punctuation
- unify style
- catch typos
- house style
- second proofs
- author queries
- avoid over-editing
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-3041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2641