IS WORK OVER?

Automation index

How much of a Forensic scientist’s job can AI already do?

A lab protocol comes earlier. A result that holds in court without contaminating do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

Forensic scientist

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Protocol, chain and the sample.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Analyse, the blank and the one that contaminates.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
Report, the link and not jumping.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
Court, the lawyer and holding.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
Police haste and not skipping the blank.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
Hold in court, and not contaminating.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • chain of custody
  • blanks
  • forensic samples
  • the link
  • the hearing
  • lab protocols
  • expert reports
  • contamination

Sources for this job· O*NET 19-4092.00· ESCO/ISCO 3119

History teacher

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Topic, sources and the outline.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Classroom, the debate and the one who drops the cliché.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
Exam, the argument and not rewarding the crib.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
Trip, the museum and getting them to actually look.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
The family, the politics and not indoctrinating.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
That they know why it happened, and not just the date.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • historical sources
  • causes outlines
  • classroom debate
  • history exams
  • museum trips
  • not indoctrinate
  • cribs
  • argument

Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2330

Analyse my job

Jobs with similar scores

  1. 333Poultry farmer22%
  2. 334Botanist22%
  3. 335Chocolatier22%
  4. 337Hotel concierge22%
  5. 338Transplant coordinator22%
  6. 339Detective22%