Automation index
How much of a Fundraiser’s job can AI already do?
A letter and a CRM come earlier. Asking for the money in person and getting it again do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Fundraiser
26%
AI can already do 26% of this job.
#199 / 643
View rankingFundraiser
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Campaigns, CRM and the donor letter.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
The meeting, the no, and asking again.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Events, legacies and the member base.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Transparency, the annual report and what you can say.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The major donor, the board and the conflict of interest.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they give again, and not spending more than comes in.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- raise funds
- donor campaigns
- member CRM
- ask for legacies
- run events
- transparency report
- major donors
- keep members
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1131.00· ESCO/ISCO 2432
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131