Automation index

How much of a Fundraiser’s job can AI already do?

A letter and a CRM come earlier. Asking for the money in person and getting it again do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

26%

AI can already do 26% of this job.

#194 / 633

Fundraiser

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Campaigns, CRM and the donor letter. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	48%	+7.7
The meeting, the no, and asking again. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Events, legacies and the member base. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	36%	+5.8
Transparency, the annual report and what you can say. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
The major donor, the board and the conflict of interest. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
That they give again, and not spending more than comes in. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		26%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

29%

#57 / 633

Criminologist

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Data, maps and the victimisation report. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	48%	+8.6
Profiles, reoffending and programme evaluation. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Field, interviews and what the spreadsheet misses. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
Police, judges and the measure under debate. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Prevention, the neighbourhood and the programme that does not fit. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
The opinion, and not selling magic recipes. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	14%	+2.2
Total	100%		28%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low