Automation index
How much of a Fundraiser’s job can AI already do?
A letter and a CRM come earlier. Asking for the money in person and getting it again do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Fundraiser
26%
AI can already do 26% of this job.
#194 / 633
View rankingFundraiser
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Campaigns, CRM and the donor letter.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
The meeting, the no, and asking again.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Events, legacies and the member base.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Transparency, the annual report and what you can say.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The major donor, the board and the conflict of interest.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they give again, and not spending more than comes in.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- raise funds
- donor campaigns
- member CRM
- ask for legacies
- run events
- transparency report
- major donors
- keep members
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1131.00· ESCO/ISCO 2432
IS WORK OVER?
Research scientist
27%
#139 / 633
View rankingResearch scientist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Literature review, figures and drafts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 48% | +10.6 |
Analysis, code and experiment boards.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 42% | +7.6 |
Design the study and the controls.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Run the experiment or the fieldwork.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
Lead a group, theses and authorship fights.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 15% | +2.1 |
Win funding and answer reviewers.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 16% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Literature review, figures and drafts
- Analysis, code and experiment boards
- Design the study and the controls
- Run the experiment or the fieldwork
- Lead a group, theses and authorship fights
- Win funding and answer reviewers
- cientifico
- investigador
- research scientist
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1029.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131