IS WORK OVER?

Automation index

How much of a Fundraiser’s job can AI already do?

A letter and a CRM come earlier. Asking for the money in person and getting it again do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

Fundraiser

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Campaigns, CRM and the donor letter.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%48%+7.7
The meeting, the no, and asking again.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
Events, legacies and the member base.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%36%+5.8
Transparency, the annual report and what you can say.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
The major donor, the board and the conflict of interest.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
That they give again, and not spending more than comes in.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%26%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • raise funds
  • donor campaigns
  • member CRM
  • ask for legacies
  • run events
  • transparency report
  • major donors
  • keep members

Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1131.00· ESCO/ISCO 2432

School sports coach

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Session, the kit and the group.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Pitch, the one who never gets the ball and the one who humiliates.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
Injury, the protocol and calling home.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
Match, the score and not shouting at a child.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
The parent, the bench and not yielding.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
That they all play, and not just the chair's child.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • school sessions
  • minute rotation
  • injury protocol
  • parents on the bench
  • not shout at children
  • kit
  • matches
  • inclusion

Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2022.00· ESCO/ISCO 3422

Analyse my job

Jobs with similar scores

  1. 207University tutor27%
  2. 208Credit analyst26%
  3. 209Librarian26%
  4. 211Ship agent26%
  5. 212Financial controller26%
  6. 213Drafter26%