Automation index

How much of a Fundraiser’s job can AI already do?

A letter and a CRM come earlier. Asking for the money in person and getting it again do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

26%

AI can already do 26% of this job.

#204 / 673

Fundraiser

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Campaigns, CRM and the donor letter. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	48%	+7.7
The meeting, the no, and asking again. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Events, legacies and the member base. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	36%	+5.8
Transparency, the annual report and what you can say. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
The major donor, the board and the conflict of interest. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
That they give again, and not spending more than comes in. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		26%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

22%

#391 / 673

Spanish language teacher

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Reading, the commentary and the rubric. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Writing, the paragraph and the one who will not start. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Speaking, the fear and getting them to talk. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Spelling, the mark-up and not humiliating. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Plagiarism, the web and not looking away. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
That they write with sense, and not copying. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low