IS WORK OVER?

Automation index

How much of a Fundraiser’s job can AI already do?

A letter and a CRM come earlier. Asking for the money in person and getting it again do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

Fundraiser

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Campaigns, CRM and the donor letter.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%48%+7.7
The meeting, the no, and asking again.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
Events, legacies and the member base.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%36%+5.8
Transparency, the annual report and what you can say.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
The major donor, the board and the conflict of interest.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
That they give again, and not spending more than comes in.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%26%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • raise funds
  • donor campaigns
  • member CRM
  • ask for legacies
  • run events
  • transparency report
  • major donors
  • keep members

Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1131.00· ESCO/ISCO 2432

Table official

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Sheet, clock and the protocol.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Fouls, the warning and the one who argues.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
Timeout, the scoreboard and not jumping it.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
The referee, the table and not contradicting.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
The crowd, the shove and keeping calm.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
A clean result, and the sheet signed.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • scoresheets
  • clock
  • fouls
  • timeouts
  • scoreboard
  • the table
  • protocol
  • warnings

Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2023.00· ESCO/ISCO 3422

Analyse my job

Jobs with similar scores

  1. 191Transcriber27%
  2. 192Credit analyst26%
  3. 193Librarian26%
  4. 195Ship agent26%
  5. 196Financial controller26%
  6. 197Drafter26%