Automation index
How much of a Furniture restorer’s job can AI already do?
A woodworm diagnosis comes earlier. Treating without overworking the piece do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Furniture restorer
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#531 / 633
View rankingFurniture restorer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Diagnosis, woodworm and the proposal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Consolidate, glue and the one that opens.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Finish, shellac and the colour.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Hardware, upholstery and what is not touched.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The owner, the memory and not leaving it too new.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Not overworking the piece, and signing the treatment.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- woodworm
- consolidate wood
- shellac
- hardware
- upholstery
- furniture diagnosis
- glue
- not overwork
Sources for this job· O*NET 51-7021.00· ESCO/ISCO 7522
IS WORK OVER?
Cartographer
31%
#31 / 633
View rankingCartographer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Sources, OSM, satellite and generalisation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Symbology, type and visual hierarchy.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Projections, scales and getting the heights right.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Review with the client, the field and the lie in the data.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Print maps, web maps and updates.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Credit, metadata and owning the map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- make maps
- generalise cartography
- symbology
- choose projection
- visual hierarchy
- update OSM
- web maps
- maps that do not lie
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-1021.00· ESCO/ISCO 2165