Automation index
How much of a Furniture restorer’s job can AI already do?
A woodworm diagnosis comes earlier. Treating without overworking the piece do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Furniture restorer
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#548 / 653
View rankingFurniture restorer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Diagnosis, woodworm and the proposal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Consolidate, glue and the one that opens.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Finish, shellac and the colour.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Hardware, upholstery and what is not touched.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The owner, the memory and not leaving it too new.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Not overworking the piece, and signing the treatment.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- woodworm
- consolidate wood
- shellac
- hardware
- upholstery
- furniture diagnosis
- glue
- not overwork
Sources for this job· O*NET 51-7021.00· ESCO/ISCO 7522
IS WORK OVER?
Pharmacovigilance officer
27%
#187 / 653
View rankingPharmacovigilance officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Case, the file and MedDRA.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Seriousness, the link and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
File, the AEMPS deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Signal, the aggregate and not playing it down.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The doctor, the ADR and not arguing the story.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
If it is serious, call it. And not staying quiet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- ADR
- MedDRA
- AEMPS
- safety signals
- seriousness
- causality
- case files
- regulatory deadlines
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2262