Automation index
How much of a Gastroenterologist’s job can AI already do?
A colonoscopy report comes earlier. Putting the scope in and not perforating do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Gastroenterologist
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#360 / 643
View rankingGastroenterologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Read endoscopies, labs and the transit study.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Colonoscopy, gastroscopy and ERCP.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
IBD, hepatitis and reflux plans.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Abdomen clinic, occult blood and the fear of cancer.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
GI emergencies and the bleed that does not stop.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Consent, perforation and signing the procedure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- do colonoscopies
- gastroscopy
- treat IBD
- ERCP
- GI clinic
- hepatitis plans
- GI bleed
- read endoscopies
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1216.00· ESCO/ISCO 2212
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131