Automation index
How much of a Gastroenterologist’s job can AI already do?
A colonoscopy report comes earlier. Putting the scope in and not perforating do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Gastroenterologist
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#352 / 633
View rankingGastroenterologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Read endoscopies, labs and the transit study.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Colonoscopy, gastroscopy and ERCP.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
IBD, hepatitis and reflux plans.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Abdomen clinic, occult blood and the fear of cancer.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
GI emergencies and the bleed that does not stop.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Consent, perforation and signing the procedure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- do colonoscopies
- gastroscopy
- treat IBD
- ERCP
- GI clinic
- hepatitis plans
- GI bleed
- read endoscopies
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1216.00· ESCO/ISCO 2212
IS WORK OVER?
Hydraulic engineer
27%
#164 / 633
View rankingHydraulic engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Hydrology, flows and the floodplain model.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Field, section and what LiDAR misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Drainage works, pumps and the outfall.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Water permits and the river authority.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The flood, the village and the yes to the channel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not flood, and not trusting the model alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- model floodplains
- flows
- drainage
- channel works
- water permits
- pumps
- channel sections
- river authority
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142