Automation index
How much of a Gastroenterologist’s job can AI already do?
A colonoscopy report comes earlier. Putting the scope in and not perforating do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Gastroenterologist
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#415 / 743
View rankingGastroenterologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Read endoscopies, labs and the transit study.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Colonoscopy, gastroscopy and ERCP.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
IBD, hepatitis and reflux plans.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Abdomen clinic, occult blood and the fear of cancer.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
GI emergencies and the bleed that does not stop.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Consent, perforation and signing the procedure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- do colonoscopies
- gastroscopy
- treat IBD
- ERCP
- GI clinic
- hepatitis plans
- GI bleed
- read endoscopies
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1216.00· ESCO/ISCO 2212
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#176 / 743
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141