Automation index

How much of a Gastroenterologist’s job can AI already do?

A colonoscopy report comes earlier. Putting the scope in and not perforating do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

22%

AI can already do 22% of this job.

#369 / 673

Gastroenterologist

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Read endoscopies, labs and the transit study. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	48%	+7.7
Colonoscopy, gastroscopy and ERCP. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	22%	10%	+2.2
IBD, hepatitis and reflux plans. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Abdomen clinic, occult blood and the fear of cancer. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
GI emergencies and the bleed that does not stop. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	18%	+2.9
Consent, perforation and signing the procedure. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	14%	12%	+1.7
Total	100%		22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

22%

#391 / 673

Spanish language teacher

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Reading, the commentary and the rubric. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Writing, the paragraph and the one who will not start. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Speaking, the fear and getting them to talk. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Spelling, the mark-up and not humiliating. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Plagiarism, the web and not looking away. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
That they write with sense, and not copying. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low