Automation index
How much of a Geneticist’s job can AI already do?
A panel comes earlier. Reading the variant and talking to the family do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Geneticist
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#154 / 623
View rankingGeneticist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Panel, variants and the report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Clinic, the pedigree and the family.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
VUS, the doubt and not scaring extra.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Lab, the sample and the one that is not enough.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The clinician, the treatment and not jumping to a yes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Read it, and talking to the family.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- genetic panels
- variants
- pedigree
- VUS
- genetic reports
- samples
- genetics clinic
- not scare
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1029.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131
IS WORK OVER?
Colourist
27%
#141 / 623
View rankingColourist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Look, stills and the reference.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Session, nodes and the hard shot.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Skin, sky and not eating the set.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Delivery, HDR and the one that misses in the theatre.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The director, the ego and not loading the orange.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Skin holds, and the look does not lie.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- looks
- nodes
- skin
- HDR
- stills
- the colour bay
- hard shots
- look references
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-4032.00· ESCO/ISCO 3521