Automation index

How much of a Geographer’s job can AI already do?

A map and a layer clip come earlier. Reading the territory and signing off the plan do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

29%

AI can already do 29% of this job.

#59 / 623

Geographer

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
GIS, layers, clips and working maps. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	48%	+8.6
Impact reports, demography and land use. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Fieldwork, interviews and checking what the map says. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
Planning, objections and work with the council. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Explain, map for non-experts and teaching. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
The territorial opinion and owning the report. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	14%	+2.2
Total	100%		28%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

29%

#57 / 623

Criminologist

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Data, maps and the victimisation report. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	48%	+8.6
Profiles, reoffending and programme evaluation. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Field, interviews and what the spreadsheet misses. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
Police, judges and the measure under debate. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Prevention, the neighbourhood and the programme that does not fit. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
The opinion, and not selling magic recipes. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	14%	+2.2
Total	100%		28%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low