IS WORK OVER?

Automation index

How much of a Geographer’s job can AI already do?

A map and a layer clip come earlier. Reading the territory and signing off the plan do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

Geographer

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
GIS, layers, clips and working maps.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%48%+8.6
Impact reports, demography and land use.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Fieldwork, interviews and checking what the map says.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
Planning, objections and work with the council.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
Explain, map for non-experts and teaching.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
The territorial opinion and owning the report.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%14%+2.2
Total100%28%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • read territory
  • run GIS
  • impact reports
  • land use
  • fieldwork
  • spatial planning
  • working maps
  • planning objections

Sources for this job· O*NET 19-3092.00· ESCO/ISCO 2632

Job insertion technician

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Employer prospecting and the agreements.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Go with them to the job and the first day.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
Follow-up, incidents and the one who quits.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%32%+5.1
Reports, indicators and justifying the grant.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
The hard candidate and the employer who pulls out.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
That they stay, and not dressing the figure.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%24%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • prospect employers
  • place candidates
  • follow up in post
  • insertion agreements
  • justify grants
  • job accompaniment
  • workplace incidents
  • insertion indicators

Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1093.00· ESCO/ISCO 2423

Analyse my job

Jobs with similar scores

  1. 56Community manager29%
  2. 57Criminologist29%
  3. 58Data protection officer29%
  4. 60Risk manager29%
  5. 61Court case manager29%
  6. 62Labour consultant29%