Automation index
How much of a Geographer’s job can AI already do?
A map and a layer clip come earlier. Reading the territory and signing off the plan do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Geographer
29%
AI can already do 29% of this job.
#59 / 693
View rankingGeographer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
GIS, layers, clips and working maps.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Impact reports, demography and land use.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Fieldwork, interviews and checking what the map says.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Planning, objections and work with the council.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Explain, map for non-experts and teaching.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The territorial opinion and owning the report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- read territory
- run GIS
- impact reports
- land use
- fieldwork
- spatial planning
- working maps
- planning objections
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-3092.00· ESCO/ISCO 2632
IS WORK OVER?
School psychologist
22%
#413 / 693
View rankingSchool psychologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Referral, tests and the report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The child, the session and the one who will not talk.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Classroom, the teacher and what actually happens.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Family, the fear and not scaring.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The bullying protocol and not looking away.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
See the child, and not hanging a label.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- school reports
- sessions with children
- psychological tests
- bullying protocol
- the family
- real classroom
- not label
- the tutor's referral
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-3031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2634