Automation index
How much of a Geographer’s job can AI already do?
A map and a layer clip come earlier. Reading the territory and signing off the plan do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Geographer
29%
AI can already do 29% of this job.
#59 / 703
View rankingGeographer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
GIS, layers, clips and working maps.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Impact reports, demography and land use.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Fieldwork, interviews and checking what the map says.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Planning, objections and work with the council.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Explain, map for non-experts and teaching.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The territorial opinion and owning the report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- read territory
- run GIS
- impact reports
- land use
- fieldwork
- spatial planning
- working maps
- planning objections
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-3092.00· ESCO/ISCO 2632
IS WORK OVER?
Tax lawyer
27%
#131 / 703
View rankingTax lawyer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Assessment, the file and the appeal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Inspection, the minute and not lying about the fact.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
TEAR, the hearing and the precedent.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Constitutional, the one that will not fly and not selling it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The client, the saving and not building a dodge.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Fight it, and not signing what will not be swallowed.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- tax appeals
- assessments
- inspection minutes
- TEAR
- precedents
- tax dodges
- the tax office
- facts
Sources for this job· O*NET 23-1011.00· ESCO/ISCO 2611