Automation index
How much of a Geological engineer’s job can AI already do?
A borehole and a 3D model come earlier. Calling whether you can found there do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Geological engineer
25%
AI can already do 25% of this job.
#238 / 623
View rankingGeological engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Boreholes, lab and the geotech profile.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 44% | +7 |
Field, outcrop and what the map misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Foundations, slopes and the risk report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Tunnel, water and the support.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The works that move, and stop or go.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Call the ground, and sign the report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 25% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- boreholes
- geotech profile
- foundations
- slopes
- tunnel support
- outcrops
- geological risk
- ground reports
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2151.00· ESCO/ISCO 2146
IS WORK OVER?
Cartographer
31%
#31 / 623
View rankingCartographer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Sources, OSM, satellite and generalisation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Symbology, type and visual hierarchy.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Projections, scales and getting the heights right.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Review with the client, the field and the lie in the data.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Print maps, web maps and updates.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Credit, metadata and owning the map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- make maps
- generalise cartography
- symbology
- choose projection
- visual hierarchy
- update OSM
- web maps
- maps that do not lie
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-1021.00· ESCO/ISCO 2165