Automation index
How much of a Gilder’s job can AI already do?
A bole comes earlier. Laying gold leaf without seeing the join do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Gilder
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#501 / 643
View rankingGilder
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Prep, bole and the ground.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Lay, gold leaf and the join.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Burnish, matte and the one that lifts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Frame, altarpiece and the client who touches.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The humidity, the shop and not laying in a rush.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
No visible join, and not eating the gold.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- bole
- gold leaf
- burnish
- joins
- frames
- altarpieces
- matte
- gilding ground
Sources for this job· O*NET 51-9123.00· ESCO/ISCO 7316
IS WORK OVER?
QA tester
38%
#11 / 643
View rankingQA tester
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Identify, analyze, and document problems with program function, output, online screen, or content.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 12% | 55% | +6.6 |
Document software defects, using a bug tracking system, and report defects to software developers.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 11% | 55% | +6.1 |
Install, maintain, or use software testing programs.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 8% | 28% | +2.2 |
Monitor program performance to ensure efficient and problem-free operations.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 6% | 28% | +1.7 |
Develop testing programs that address areas such as database impacts, software scenarios, regression testing, negative testing, error or bug retests, or usability.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 6% | 48% | +2.9 |
Document test procedures to ensure replicability and compliance with standards.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 6% | 55% | +3.3 |
Create or maintain databases of known test defects.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 6% | 48% | +2.9 |
Provide feedback and recommendations to developers on software usability and functionality.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 6% | 28% | +1.7 |
Other less frequent tasks (weight estimated from frequency).EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 39% | 28% | +10.9 |
| Total | 100% | 38% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- internal risk management policy
- ICT quality policy
- software anomalies
- levels of software testing
- quality standards
- quality assurance methodologies
- ICT process quality models
- set quality assurance objectives
- ensure continuous preparedness for audits
- comply with legal regulations
Sources for this job· O*NET 15-1253.00· ESCO/ISCO 2519