Automation index

How much of a GIS technician’s job can AI already do?

A clip and a shapefile come earlier. The map matching the ground do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

28%

AI can already do 28% of this job.

#122 / 623

GIS technician

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Layers, projections and the geoprocess. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	52%	+9.4
Quality, topology and the attribute error. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Field, GPS and what the satellite misses. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Publish, services and the viewer that dies. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
The client, the deadline and the layer that does not exist. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
That it matches the ground, and not mixing datums. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		28%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

29%

#57 / 623

Criminologist

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Data, maps and the victimisation report. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	48%	+8.6
Profiles, reoffending and programme evaluation. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Field, interviews and what the spreadsheet misses. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
Police, judges and the measure under debate. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Prevention, the neighbourhood and the programme that does not fit. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
The opinion, and not selling magic recipes. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	14%	+2.2
Total	100%		28%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low