Automation index
How much of a Glassblower’s job can AI already do?
A stock gather comes earlier. Gathering, blowing without leaving stress in the piece do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Glassblower
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#567 / 653
View rankingGlassblower
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Furnace, pipe and the gather.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Blow, shape and the one that drops.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Anneal, cut and the stresses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Order, the colour and the one that misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The heat, the rhythm and not rushing the anneal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
No stress, and not leaving it raw.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- gather glass
- blow
- pipe
- anneal
- stresses
- glass furnace
- glass moulds
- cut the cane
Sources for this job· O*NET 51-9195.00· ESCO/ISCO 7315
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131