Automation index
How much of a Golf professional’s job can AI already do?
A swing clip comes earlier. Changing the strike so the handicap comes down do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Golf professional
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#438 / 743
View rankingGolf professional
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Swing, clip and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Course, the pupil and the one who does not listen.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Putting, the green and patience.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Handicap, the event and not inflating.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The shop, the club and not selling smoke.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Bring the handicap down, and not breaking the swing.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- swing
- strike clip
- putting
- handicap
- the green
- events
- clubs
- the range
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2022.00· ESCO/ISCO 3422
IS WORK OVER?
Acoustics engineer
27%
#170 / 743
View rankingAcoustics engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Reading, the map and the standard.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Works, the insulation and what was not put in.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Simulation, the model and not trusting it alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Report, the neighbour and not softening the dB.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The council, the licence and not dressing it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Bring it down for real, and not selling the miracle panel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- noise maps
- insulation
- dB
- acoustic simulations
- standards
- licences
- neighbours
- field readings
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2199.00· ESCO/ISCO 2149