IS WORK OVER?

Automation index

How much of a Golf professional’s job can AI already do?

A swing clip comes earlier. Changing the strike so the handicap comes down do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

Golf professional

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Swing, clip and the plan.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Course, the pupil and the one who does not listen.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
Putting, the green and patience.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
Handicap, the event and not inflating.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
The shop, the club and not selling smoke.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
Bring the handicap down, and not breaking the swing.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • swing
  • strike clip
  • putting
  • handicap
  • the green
  • events
  • clubs
  • the range

Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2022.00· ESCO/ISCO 3422

Spanish language teacher

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Reading, the commentary and the rubric.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Writing, the paragraph and the one who will not start.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
Speaking, the fear and getting them to talk.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
Spelling, the mark-up and not humiliating.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
Plagiarism, the web and not looking away.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
That they write with sense, and not copying.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • text commentary
  • writing
  • speaking
  • spelling
  • language rubrics
  • plagiarism
  • paragraphs
  • reading

Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2330

Analyse my job

Jobs with similar scores

  1. 386Science teacher22%
  2. 387PE teacher22%
  3. 388Vocational teacher22%
  4. 390History teacher22%
  5. 391Spanish language teacher22%
  6. 392Maths teacher22%