Automation index
How much of a Grants officer’s job can AI already do?
A form comes earlier. Justifying without giving the money back do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Grants officer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#185 / 623
View rankingGrants officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Call, form and the deadline.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Report, indicators and not inflating.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Justify, invoices and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Query, the silence and answering.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The project, the cut and not promising extra.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Justify, and not giving it back.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- calls
- forms
- reports
- justify invoices
- indicators
- queries
- grant deadlines
- clawbacks
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1131.00· ESCO/ISCO 2422
IS WORK OVER?
Table official
22%
#346 / 623
View rankingTable official
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Sheet, clock and the protocol.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Fouls, the warning and the one who argues.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Timeout, the scoreboard and not jumping it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The referee, the table and not contradicting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The crowd, the shove and keeping calm.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
A clean result, and the sheet signed.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- scoresheets
- clock
- fouls
- timeouts
- scoreboard
- the table
- protocol
- warnings
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2023.00· ESCO/ISCO 3422