Automation index
How much of a Grants officer’s job can AI already do?
A form comes earlier. Justifying without giving the money back do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Grants officer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#185 / 633
View rankingGrants officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Call, form and the deadline.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Report, indicators and not inflating.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Justify, invoices and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Query, the silence and answering.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The project, the cut and not promising extra.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Justify, and not giving it back.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- calls
- forms
- reports
- justify invoices
- indicators
- queries
- grant deadlines
- clawbacks
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1131.00· ESCO/ISCO 2422
IS WORK OVER?
Talent scout
27%
#170 / 633
View rankingTalent scout
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Match, notes and the report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
See them live, the setting and the one who hides.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Data, GPS and not trusting the clip alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Network, agents and the one already promised.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The club, the rush and not inflating the average.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
See the player, and not falling for the goal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- scout reports
- see live
- player GPS
- agents
- scout network
- data
- clips
- the player’s setting
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2022.00· ESCO/ISCO 3422