Automation index
How much of a Growth manager’s job can AI already do?
An A/B test and a funnel report come earlier. Picking this week’s bet and fighting for budget do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Growth manager
31%
AI can already do 31% of this job.
#35 / 643
View rankingGrowth manager
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Analytics, funnels and growth dashboards.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 52% | +11.4 |
Copy, creatives and test variants.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Design experiments and read causality.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Align product, marketing and sales.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 15% | +2.4 |
Ads budget and internal negotiation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 18% | +2.5 |
Decide what dies and what scales.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 16% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Analytics, funnels and growth dashboards
- Copy, creatives and test variants
- Design experiments and read causality
- Align product, marketing and sales
- Ads budget and internal negotiation
- Decide what dies and what scales
- growth manager
- growth hacker
- responsable de growth
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1161.00· ESCO/ISCO 2431
IS WORK OVER?
Pharmacovigilance officer
27%
#186 / 643
View rankingPharmacovigilance officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Case, the file and MedDRA.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Seriousness, the link and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
File, the AEMPS deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Signal, the aggregate and not playing it down.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The doctor, the ADR and not arguing the story.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
If it is serious, call it. And not staying quiet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- ADR
- MedDRA
- AEMPS
- safety signals
- seriousness
- causality
- case files
- regulatory deadlines
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2262